[Mike Barrio]

Small black things catch fish

[Ben Dixon]

Out on the Don over the weekend, Stoneflies, Midge and a couple of olives seen.  Heard but did not see a few trout move, too.


Cheers

Ben

[Andy Finlay]

I've been out a few time as well, starting to see a bit of fly life and also a few trout. Unfortunately also spoke to an old guy who'd taken a large brownie a few weeks ago, said it was 4lbs but someone else who had seen it said it was nearer 8lbs. Does put you off the ADAA a bit as seen quite a few nice fish end up in carrier bags last year as well.

[Sandy Nelson]

HI Andy

I hear you and agree but you can't blame the club, the rules state all brown trout over 18" must be returned, not all the other beat owners on the river even state this. Its very hard to enforce and like most rules relies on individuals following them. So blame the people not the organisation.
The fish, if it was kept, was also taken out of season so also breaking more of the rules of the club , the PO and the national laws, if it was silver then its classed as a crime, just a pity the same doesn't seem to apply to Gold.

We are supposed to live in more enlightened times, but a lot of people still require a bit of re-education to realise that the rules have changed in the last 20 years. Not quite sure how you can do this beyond mentioning it to people.

Sandy

[Rob Brownfield]

I've been out a few time as well, starting to see a bit of fly life and also a few trout. Unfortunately also spoke to an old guy who'd taken a large brownie a few weeks ago, said it was 4lbs but someone else who had seen it said it was nearer 8lbs. Does put you off the ADAA a bit as seen quite a few nice fish end up in carrier bags last year as well.

Hi Andy, I know you probably don't have a name, but I would be letting the ADAA committee know. If they are not told, they cannot do anything about it.

[Andy Finlay]

Sandy, I'm not blaming the ADAA but it was ADAA water and therefore a member. Unfortunately over last season and now this there seems to be quite a number of people fishing the ADAA beats who either don't know the rules or chose to ignore them.

Rob, I did say to the guy that it was out of season and the fish should have been returned but usual response, fish swallowed the rapala and nothing else he could do. Unfortunately I did not ask for his name and membership details at the time.

[Rob Brownfield]

fish swallowed the rapala

I am guessing he had not converted the Rapala to fit with ADAA rules of only one treble on a lure. I think the rules say that even dead fish must be returned out of season??

A real shame

[Iain Cameron]

Quote from: Andyf on Yesterday at 22:27:28

Does put you off the ADAA a bit as seen quite a few nice fish end up in carrier bags last year as well.

As others have said, the rules are there, and we rely on our members to abide by them. There is an ADAA disciplinary committee, and they have and will take action, such as annulling membership, on breaches of rules. There are watchers and bailiffs, but we also rely on other anglers to keep us informed of rule breaches.

I'm happy to take forward, anonymously, any concerns or noted rule breaches
iain

ps - Our return rate for Brown Trout was 95% last year; see the full catch report doc via http://www.adaa.org.uk/#!catches/cq4e

[Andy Finlay]

Iain, i would be interested in knowing how the figures are established. You are stateing 95% return rate, from where are you getting this figure. I take it this is from the few members who actually log returns. I'm all up for promoting the ADAA but to be honest find numbers like that very optimistic.

[allabootthetroot]

Disgusting behavior chapping a trout out of season  . I remember one of martins reports on fishpal last year saying there is still some eegits out there that will chap every thing.

[Iain Cameron]

Iain, i would be interested in knowing how the figures are established. You are stateing 95% return rate, from where are you getting this figure.

hi Andy

I'm catch returns convener for ADAA. Last year, we had 2,268 returns (ie 2,268 fish), with 200 different anglers recording at least one catch.

I summarise the recorded catches; there's a field where the angler records if they kept or released their catch, and I use that to derive the figure. You can see my summary for 2014 in the PDF on the page I linked to in my previous post.

For browns, we had 904 recorded catches, of which 862 (95%) were returned.

cheers
iain

[Iain Cameron]

Walking the dog along the river bank today around 1.15. Finally saw a couple of trout rising, both rose a couple of times before I moved on. Didn't see what they took, but there were a couple of olive duns on the water, and the rises were fairly solid, so I'd suspect that it was LDOs.


... only a couple of weeks to go now!

[Ben Dixon]

It would be a lot easier if everything was just catch & release.  Only other option I could see would be tags for all species and for it to be mandatory to carry a scale & tape in the same way as it is to carry a permit.

ADAA do take positive steps to make sure that their members are obeying the rules in my experience but, there are a lot of members and a lot of water and like any organisation or association, there will be a few numb skulls.  The majority should not be tarred with that brush and, there are still plenty of butchers fishing on non ADAA waters pretty much unchecked,

As far as big fish go, there is still this misguided nonsense about "cannibal trout" and I still hear it from some who really should know better. 

For browns, we had 904 recorded catches, of which 862 (95%) were returned.

I'd be absolutely astonished if that was the real total, Iain, and I'd be very surprised if the locations and weights were accurate in the case of good fish.  Not really sure that the current method or channels for recording trout catches really encourage accurate submission of data.  It's a little different for migratory fish.

Cheers

Ben

[Colin Sunley]

Human nature dictates that some will not bother with reporting a catch or three so the figures will be about 5 to 10 % higher even without that the figures still show almost 50% increase in trout and a 50% decrease in salmon. Will be interesting to see what this years brings

[Ben Dixon]

Human nature dictates that some will not bother with reporting a catch or three so the figures will be about 5 to 10 % higher even without that the figures still show almost 50% increase in trout and a 50% decrease in salmon. Will be interesting to see what this years brings

Not sure if it has been noted in this years thread yet but please use common sense when reporting catches here or anywhere else. 

Everyone likes to read a good fishing report but photos should be cropped to not give away exact locations and pools should not be mentioned.

Cheers

Ben