Fishing The Fly Scotland Forum

Mike Barrio

Spey casting #3
« on: 23/01/2010 at 23:12 »
Thought you might like to see this one guys ...........


Hamish Young

Re: Spey casting #3
« Reply #1 on: 24/01/2010 at 10:43 »
You've got to love a Skagit line  :wink

Ben Dixon

Re: Spey casting #3
« Reply #2 on: 24/01/2010 at 12:29 »
Nice jump roll but does not look like a Skagit set up and certainly not a "Skagit" style cast.

Ben

Rob Brownfield

Re: Spey casting #3
« Reply #3 on: 25/01/2010 at 16:30 »
I am a bit confused....he will never catch anything as he does not leave the fly in the water long enough ;)

Paul Rankine

Re: Spey casting #3
« Reply #4 on: 09/02/2010 at 20:05 »
Hi All,
          It's a casting demo Rob, silly !!

Technically though , is it a "SPEY Cast" ? There is no change of direction .  :wink  . Just looks like a roll cast to me , can't see much of a jump Ben if I,m being pedantic.

Excellent roll casting technique though  :cool:   .

Nice one Mike.

Paul.

Iain Goolager

Re: Spey casting #3
« Reply #5 on: 09/02/2010 at 21:38 »
EMI (excuse my ignorance), but is a jump roll and switch cast the same thing? or am I asking if an elephant is indeed a tiger? :oops

Alan (if I'm wrong)







Iain (if I'm correct)

Paul Rankine

Re: Spey casting #3
« Reply #6 on: 10/02/2010 at 12:43 »
HI Iain,
             No , an elephant is not a tiger . Have a look in SexyLoops.  :z4

Paul.

Ben Dixon

Re: Spey casting #3
« Reply #7 on: 10/02/2010 at 15:10 »
Hi All,
          It's a casting demo Rob, silly !!

Technically though , is it a "SPEY Cast" ? There is no change of direction .  :wink  . Just looks like a roll cast to me , can't see much of a jump Ben if I,m being pedantic.

Excellent roll casting technique though  :cool:   .

Nice one Mike.

Paul.

Hi Paul,

You can see the disturbance on the water where the line leaves and re-alights on the surface.  The anchor is so nicely set that it is hard to spot.

Cheers

Ben

Iain Goolager

Re: Spey casting #3
« Reply #8 on: 10/02/2010 at 15:36 »
Quote
Have a look in SexyLoops.


Hey Paul, just did and they say that this tiger indeed has a trunk.
Over to you - or anyone else.

Iain

Irvine Ross

Re: Spey casting #3
« Reply #9 on: 10/02/2010 at 17:42 »
Mr Sexyloops he say

"Historically the switch cast predates spey casting. Basically the switch cast is exactly the same as the single-spey, but with one small difference: the fly does not kiss the water on the backcast."

BUT then he says

"This said, now the Switch Cast is most commonly used to refer to the Jump or Dynamic Roll. Don't you just love us flycasting instructors?"

So the tiger has a trunk..... sometimes.......... depending on who's talking.

There Ian, hopes that's cleared that up for you.

Saggyloops

Iain Goolager

Re: Spey casting #3
« Reply #10 on: 10/02/2010 at 20:17 »
Crystal, I think ???

 :grin

Mike Barrio

Re: Spey casting #3
« Reply #11 on: 10/02/2010 at 21:11 »
Crystal, I think ???

 :grin

Nothing is crystal on Loops, nor on here for that matter ........... Cool :z16

Cheers
Mike

Ben Dixon

Re: Spey casting #3
« Reply #12 on: 10/02/2010 at 21:57 »
I believe the quoted historical meaning of the term switch cast to be correct, a single Spey with no anchor.  I do not use the term switch cast as it is confusing, I would call the cast in the clip a jump roll.  I don't use the term forward Spey although I know many are using these days, I teach a Single Spey as a simple jump roll with a change of direction.

Cheers

Ben

Paul Rankine

Re: Spey casting #3
« Reply #13 on: 11/02/2010 at 12:34 »
Hi Ben,
             I'd go along with that.

Paul.

 




Barrio Fly Lines - designed in Scotland - Cast with confidence all over the world

Barrio Fly Lines

Designed in Scotland

Manufactured in the UK

Cast with confidence all over the world

www.flylineshop.com